The Many Perils of America’s War on Iran

Hegseth Boasts of War Without Mercy; What We Need Is Merciful Peace

BILL ASTORE

MAR 04, 2026

Reading NBC News this morning, I saw where the U.S. “is winning decisively, devastatingly and without mercy,” so claimed self-styled Secretary of War Pete Hegseth. “We are only four days in,” he added, and the U.S. “will take all the time we need” to prevail. He further added “We are punching them while they’re down, which is exactly how it should be.” (There’s nothing more honorable than punching someone when they’re down, right?)

“They [the Iranians] are toast, and they know it, or at least, soon enough, they will know it. And we have only just begun, to hunt, dismantle, demoralize, destroy and defeat their capabilities,” Hegseth boasted. As far as how long the war will last, he equivocated. Three weeks? Eight weeks? Who knows? Hegseth doesn’t.

Hegseth also doesn’t know something fundamental: You can’t do a wrong thing the right way.

The Iran War is wrong. It’s illegal, unconstitutional, immoral, and also extremely dangerous. There’s no way to prevail in a war fought for the wrong reasons, a war fought without clear goals, a war that is already beginning to spiral out of control. But Hegseth thinks if the U.S. launches enough missiles, drops enough bombs, and torpedoes enough ships, somehow the U.S. will “win.”

Congratulations, U.S. and Israel: You made him a martyr

In so many ways, the U.S. has already lost. The Ayatollah Khamenei is now a martyr. Iran is now more likely to pursue a nuclear weapon. Even more so than usual, Israel is now in the driver’s seat, calling America’s shots in the Middle East. This has all the makings of a major catastrophe for U.S. forces, but all Hegseth can see is the promise of punching a man when he’s down.

Clearly, Hegseth is intoxicated with winning “without mercy.” Think about that for a moment—war without mercy. Only the most barbaric or fanatical person would boast about waging war without mercy.

With the Iran War, the Trump administration is marching down the most perilous of paths, blinded by illusions of total victory.

A warning: More than anything, America must not allow this to become a religious war, a crusade, between a Judeo-Christian force and a Shia-Islamic force. We’re already seeing a lot of talk within the U.S. military of a God-driven mission against Iran, with (positive!) references to Armageddon. Such rhetoric is incredibly dangerous and inflammatory. (In this context, that crusader cross tattoo on Hegseth’s chest is more than alarming.)

If anything, the best outcome for the U.S. would be an immediate ceasefire before more U.S. troops are killed and wounded. But how is such a ceasefire to be negotiated? U.S. diplomacy has no credibility. None.

Among the worst outcomes would be the commitment of U.S. troops to Iran, so-called boots on the ground, which would likely create a massive Bay of Pigs-style fiasco. America can ill afford yet another land war quagmire in the Middle East. There is already talk, however, of committing U.S. Special Forces to Iran, perhaps to organize Kurdish and Iranian dissidents against the legitimate Iranian government. Such folly must be prevented.

Any commitment of U.S. troops to Iran would further accelerate escalation. If you begin to hear rumblings about Selective Service and a return to a military draft, you’ll know the Trump administration has become completely unhinged (if it isn’t already).

In just a few days of “major combat operations,” the Trump administration already has more than enough innocent Iranian blood on its hands. That toll in blood is only going to increase, as will the risk of blowback on the “homeland.”

The smartest course for America at this moment is to declare “victory” and leave. Since it’s unlikely Trump and Hegseth will see the light, Congress should immediately cut war funding. Sadly, a weak-willed Congress seems far more likely to pass supplemental funding bills to give Trump and Hegseth a blank check to wage a Judeo-Christian crusade.

We don’t live in interesting times: we live in unhinged times. Perilous times. We must find a way to seek a merciful peace. The alternative just might be World War III.

3 thoughts on “The Many Perils of America’s War on Iran

  1. [From my Substack entry]

    Bill, you have said a lot, and said it very well. It also says a lot – meaning the MICIMATT-SH and “Manufacturing Consent” – that NBC, ABC, CBS, CNN, NPR haven’t had you on to repeat these very words stated here.

    I caught some of that update this morning on t.v. with the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff reciting the script given him by the DoD Public Affairs Office and the IDF/Mossad/Israeli Ministry of Propaganda. (Apparently they’ve learned the lesson not to engage in overkill with a PowerPoint presentation.) One snippet of his I was able to write down was “an incredible demonstration of America’s global reach…” a truism which he was selling as a reassuring boast, and I took as frightening.

    When it came Hegseth’s turn, he spewed forth with a litany of Rubio- and Leavitt-isms that could only be attributed to him and those two gems, no other individual or organization could come up with such inanities.

    In a[n undoubtedly] fruitless effort to bring an end to the present nonsense and reverse the inexorable “Iceberg ahead!” course on which this country is headed, it needs to emulate South Africa and establish a Truth & Reconciliation Commission, not only for the degradations done its own people – e.g., the Blacks, the poor, everyone cheated by the 1% – but also done the world, e.g., Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Latin and South America, and Gaza and Palestine.

    Don’t hold your breath, don’t even bother with a scuba tank.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Hegseth…

    I’m reminded of the scene in the movie, “Patton” when Omar Bradley says to Patton regarding war, “the trouble with you, George, is you love it”

    I also recall Robert McNamara who, to his credit, was filled with remorse for his part in the Vietnam disaster. I cannot imagine this for Hegseth.

    Like

  3. “I cannot imagine this for Hegseth.”

    Should a latter day “Judgment at Nuremberg” ever come to pass as a result of this country’s latest embrace of war crimes in pursuit of illicit ends, Hegseth would be defiant to the end, just like the “Emil Hahn” character played by Otto Klemperer in the original.  I’d like to see Hegseth’sperformance.

    Like

Leave a comment