Today I saw this bulletin from FP: Foreign Policy:
OUTSIDE THE WIRE: Several years after pulling back, American troops will head outside the wire to battle the Taliban and turn up the air war, FP’s Paul McLeary and Dan De Luce report.
America’s wars never end. So much for Armistice Day of 99 years ago. In place of Woodrow Wilson’s eternal peace, we now have eternal war. It doesn’t have to be this way. We have a choice, as this article, that I wrote for Veterans Day in 2009, suggests.
Thirty years ago, I attended Boys State. Run by the American Legion, Boys State introduces high school students to civics and government in a climate that bears a passing resemblance to military basic training. Arranged in “companies,” we students did our share of hurrying up, lining up, and waiting (sound preparation, in fact, for my career in the military). I recall that one morning a “company” of students got to eat first because they launched into a lusty rendition of the Marine Corps hymn. I wasn’t angry at them: I was angry at myself for not thinking of the ruse first.
Today, most of my Boys State experience is a blur, but one event looms large: the remarks made by a grizzled veteran to us assembled boys. Standing humbly before us, he confessed that he hoped organizations like the American Legion and Veterans of Foreign Wars would soon wither away. And he said that he hoped none of us would ever become a member of his post.
At first, we didn’t get it. Didn’t he like us? Weren’t we tough enough? (Indeed, I recall that one of our adolescent complaints was that the name “Boys State” didn’t seem manly enough.)
Then it dawned on us what the withering away of organizations like the American Legion and the VFW would mean. That in our future young Americans would no longer be fighting and dying in foreign wars. That our world would be both saner and safer, and only members of an “old guard” like this unnamed veteran would be able to swap true war stories. Our role would simply be to listen with unmeasured awe and undisguised thanks, grateful that our own sons and daughters no longer had to risk life or limb to enemy bullets and bombs.
It pains me that we as a country have allowed this veteran’s dream to die. We as a country continue to enlarge our military, expand our foreign commitments, and fight seemingly endless wars, whether in Iraq, Afghanistan, or in other far-off realms of less-than-vital interest to us.
As a result of these wars, we continue to churn out so many new veterans, including so many wounded veterans, not forgetting those who never made it back.
Collectively, we Americans tend to suppress whatever doubts we have about the wisdom of our wars with unequivocal statements of support for our troops. And on days like Veteran’s Day, we honor those who served, and especially those who paid the ultimate price on the battlefield.
Yet, wouldn’t the best support for our troops be the achievement of the dream of that grizzled vet who cut through a young man’s fog thirty years ago?
Shouldn’t we be working to achieve a new age in which the rosters of our local VFWs and Legion posts are no longer renewed with the broken bodies and shattered minds of American combat veterans?
Sadly, as we raise more troops and fight more wars, we seem committed to the opposite. Our military just enjoyed its best recruiting class in years. This “success” is not entirely surprising. It’s no longer that difficult to fill our military’s expanding ranks because many of our young men and women simply have little choice but to enlist, whether for economic opportunity, money for college, or benefits like free health care.
Many of course enlist for patriotic reasons as well. Yet the ease of expanding our military ranks during a shooting war is also a painful reminder of the impoverishment of opportunities for young, able-bodied Americans – the bitter fruit of manufacturing jobs sent overseas, of farming jobs eliminated by our own version of corporate collectivization, of a real national unemployment rate that is approaching twenty percent.
On this Veteran’s Day, what if we began to measure our national success and power, not by our military arsenal or by the number of new recruits in the ranks, but rather by the gradual shrinking of our military ranks, the decline of our spending on defense, perhaps even by the growing quiet of our legion posts and VFW halls?
Wouldn’t that be a truer measure of national success: fewer American combat veterans?
Wouldn’t that give us something to celebrate this Veteran’s Day?
I know one old grizzled veteran who would quietly nod his agreement.
4 thoughts on “One Grizzled Veteran’s Dream”
‘VFW’ always rings a bell with me; that’s where Smedley Butler gave his famous “War is a Racket” speech. Easy to find, only 8 minutes, he says it all. Look it up! He had more gonads than ANY ‘General’* today!
Perhaps more futuristic today than when he said it, his “hitman” description of himself, “making American industry & banking safe” in foreign lands makes me wonder: Is America now reduced to making war, not consumer goods? As Astore points out, US unemployment is 20%, not 4.3. AND, people joining the forces are doing for financial duress problems.
* So let’s take them apart: Flynn is being accused of taking a bribe of 15Mil$ to ship out Gulen to Turkey – on a taxpayer’s paid for AF plane?! True or not, it shows me the corruption of wars. Today we have the “anti corruption” (HAH!) of arresting Saudi “investors” in US economy – if you can call it that. They’re broke! I’ve read. So a failing war with Yemen, with American arms, is supposed to right the problem? The arrested ‘Princes’ are no more corrupt than themselves – it’s a money grab. I think US engineered this coop, and plan to steal their money – that’s how broke we are with all our unwinnable wars.
EXACTLY WHAT SMEDEY BUTLER WAS SAYING!
An excellent long read……
Do our leaders learn NOTHING from History?
Thanks for the link. With respect to our leaders, I think they learn what they want to learn — and what confirms their agendas.
I good link RS. Many years ago I read a book that covered not only WW 2 in the Pacific, but focused on late 19th century Japan up until the Japanese defeat in WW 2. The premise of the book was a fear in Japan that since their natural resources for a modern industrial society and military were severely limited, Japan could be economically squeezed by the West. Japan’s take away was, might made right as exemplified by the West in carving out colonies. If the West could take colonies via military force, then Japan could invade China in the 1930’s. Japan could also be a useful tool as a counter force in the Far East to Soviet expansion.
What the Japanese failed to realize was White Made Right.
I found a good commentary on The Danger of the Sacred Soldier. The author mentions a “fearsome rhetorical barrage leveled at Kaepernick for what it is: one symptom in a larger malady afflicting the country from root to branch”. With no intellectual logical thought a visible protest was turned into: “Why do you hate the troops?” http://www.smirkingchimp.com/thread/william-rivers-pitt/76202/the-danger-of-the-sacred-soldier
Comments are closed.