The New Dishonest Word of the Moment
FEB 09, 2026
I’ve been noticing a new word of the moment: “guardrails.” President Trump is smashing the guardrails of democracy. At the same time, new guardrails are the answer to ICE murders in Minneapolis, at least according to Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries.
If guardrails are so easy for Trump to smash, how are new ones going to restrain the power of ICE and prevent abuses?
Remember when we used to talk about laws? That you had to obey the law of the land else be prosecuted for violating it? We need clear and enforceable laws and a system that upholds them, not more “guardrails.”
I suppose “guardrail” is a metaphor that’s easily understood—they help keep us on the road, right? Yet cars and trucks do smash through them, so are they really the answer to restraining Trump and ICE?
As Stephen Semler notes here, Schumer and Jeffries promote “guardrails” for ICE even as they propose to fully fund the agency, making it easy for ICE to say, sure, we’ll respect your guardrails even as they drive their SUVs and surplus military equipment through them.
America is supposed to be a nation of laws, not guardrails. If ICE and Trump are like out-of-control trucks, no metaphorical guardrail is going to restrain them. A strong Constitutional system upheld and enforced by officials of integrity and courage, however, could and should.
Bracing Views 
I recall Reagan saying that it is frightening to hear someone say, “I’m from the government and I’m here to help”
What is truly frightening is President Trump announcing that his morality rules over international law.
LikeLike
This independent who despises the two-party system has something to say! I read up to the point of “A nation of laws and guardrails”…and realize that therein lies the fatal flaw, the heel of Achilles. On so many levels, J6 could-and should-have been a cut-and-dried case against the current past candidate now posing as president. The founders of our nation would not have tolerated such an event. They created a solid system of laws as well as enforcers, but did they anticipate the hour required of each step? It seems a glaring oversight at the current moment when we find ourselves led by a poseur who, on J6 and now-as it seems by the numerous cases before the courts on all levels- made his name and fortunes on a talent of running the clock out…by skillfully playing the processes of the courts and the cold-molasses speed of blind justice to his own advantage. Justice may (supposedly) be blind, but the current occupant knows from 40 years of experience that it is never swift. His goals shall be realized in at least some part before the legality of any of them clears the court.
LikeLike