Putting Warheads on Foreheads

W.J. Astore

How “Your” Military Thinks About War

I was reading an article from 2007 by an Air Force master sergeant, “We are called Airmen,” only to stumble on these lines:

You have to be able to understand what part you play in America’s defense. You have to be disciplined and willing to maintain your readiness to go wherever our enemy confronts us and to live up to the ideals of the core values of integrity, service and excellence. 

As an Airman, you have to bring airpower to the battlespace effectively and ensure it is properly applied. 

Your charge as an Airman of the 4th Fighter Wing is to deliver “combat airpower, on target, on time for America, or more simply, “put warheads on foreheads.”

Now, this article is featured on the Air Force’s official website, so I assume it captures important truths the AF wants its airmen to know. But are these “truths” really true? Is that all there is, my friend? Then let’s keep bombing.

Who is “our enemy”? What are the reasons why this enemy “confronts us”? Is America’s “defense” really safeguarded if the mission is everywhere and anywhere and “wherever” U.S. forces are “confronted”?

And how do you apply airpower “properly” in the “battlespace”? The author has the answer to that one: by putting “warheads on foreheads.” Or, as we said in my day, by putting bombs on target.

Put those warheads on foreheads!

Of course, this is rah-rah stuff, military cheerleading, if you will. The article was posted during the Iraq War, when the Air Force was at pains to stress its relevance in what was largely a ground war. Which explains this passage:

We are doing so well [in the war on terror], we make it look too easy. Our weapons systems are so precise; we can deliver ordnance anywhere, any time. If [sic] fact, if ground troops chase the enemy into a house, our aircraft can drop a bomb that eradicates one mud hut, while leaving all the others in the neighborhood standing.

Now that’s what I call precision! The Air Force made it look too easy! We dropped warheads on the foreheads of evil-doers without any innocents being killed and wounded. It’s almost as if our bombs and warheads sang “Amazing Grace” as they slammed into the enemy (and only the enemy, whoever that might be and wherever they might live).

Mosul, Iraq. Sure looks like “precision” attacks to me

Naturally, this article also makes reference to the “Airman’s warrior ethos.” That old idea (and ideal) of the citizen-airman who serves to support and defend the U.S. Constitution isn’t even mentioned. We’re all “warriors” and “warfighters” now.

Ours not to reason why; ours but to drop warheads on foreheads; theirs but to scream and die.

What is it, exactly, that the U.S. military is making it look “too easy” to do? Having lost the Iraq and Afghan wars despite enormous amounts of munitions used, it seems “losing” is the answer here. That, and killing, of course. And not just the bad guys.

3 thoughts on “Putting Warheads on Foreheads

  1. Sacred Surgical Strikes

    Quietly one cannot go
    About an amputation.
    Neatly neither can blood flow,
    Nor sap and sawdust ever grow
    Where limbs fly off and butchers crow:
    In slaughter, their salvation.

    In abattoir and arbor, they
    Perform the surgeon’s mauling.
    The animals and plants they slay
    Efficiently, both night and day,
    Dismembering what doesn’t pay
    To live — a breed appalling.

    But doctors of divinity
    Have sworn in sacred theses
    That what man wishes, man can do:
    The rape of many by the few;
    The just deserts, the proper due
    Of GAWD’s own chosen species.

    Michael Murry, “The Misfortune Teller,” Copyright 2014

    Like

  2. Selling bankrupt foreign policy and BS justifications for violence enacted on others is quite cheap. The price? A rhetorical flourish, a bit of alliteration, or a rhyme. Worked beautifully for Johnnie Cochran.

    Liked by 1 person

Comments are closed.